<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A glimpse at the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francethisway.com/wp/a-glimpse-at-the-future/2009/04/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francethisway.com/wp/a-glimpse-at-the-future/2009/04/</link>
	<description>Living in France and daily life for a UK expat in the French blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:33:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Doust</title>
		<link>http://www.francethisway.com/wp/a-glimpse-at-the-future/2009/04/comment-page-1/#comment-15540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Doust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francethisway.com/wp/?p=865#comment-15540</guid>
		<description>Could be...then again, it may be that people are changing the parameters that they search on.

When we were young and naïve and thought that entering &quot;Holidays in France&quot; into a search engine would actually yield some usefeul results (around 2004 that would be) then that was whet we did.

But then search engine optimisation came along and &quot;Holidays in France&quot; would bring up anything but and quite a lot of pornography to boot, so we (or, at least, I) got a little more savvy about how we searched. 

Nowadays, if I were serious about a holiday in a part of the world that I had not visited before I would first go to our local library and find a guide, make a few notes and then do far more specific searches based on what I had found. 

Google is important, no doubt, but their importance can be exagerated. There remains more than one way to skin a cat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be&#8230;then again, it may be that people are changing the parameters that they search on.</p>
<p>When we were young and naïve and thought that entering &#8220;Holidays in France&#8221; into a search engine would actually yield some usefeul results (around 2004 that would be) then that was whet we did.</p>
<p>But then search engine optimisation came along and &#8220;Holidays in France&#8221; would bring up anything but and quite a lot of pornography to boot, so we (or, at least, I) got a little more savvy about how we searched. </p>
<p>Nowadays, if I were serious about a holiday in a part of the world that I had not visited before I would first go to our local library and find a guide, make a few notes and then do far more specific searches based on what I had found. </p>
<p>Google is important, no doubt, but their importance can be exagerated. There remains more than one way to skin a cat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

